I had to run the comparable sales data for a house in the area between Chevy Chase and UK. My buyer wanted to know what I thought a house I showed him was worth. Usually comps aren’t too hard. In a newer neighborhood, they can be really easy since sometimes you can even find three of the exact same floor plans to use.

Older houses are a little harder to comp. For example, the 3 best ones I had to pick from today were all in the same area, but were very different. A lot of realtors would have just divided the sale price by the square footage, maybe added/subtracted for differences such as the number of bathrooms or a garage. (Or even worse, just gone with what Zillow says is the value.) It is all a very logical process of averaging data to come up with an opinion of value. The only problem is that it doesn’t always work.

Back to my story….

The cheapest one was on the edge of the neighborhood near where the commercial section ends on South Ashland. That corner of the neighborhood has a very different vibe than the one I saw with my buyer.  The next one was right around the corner from the house I showed. You’d think that would have been a good one. But, it was much bigger, had been converted to student housing a long time ago, had a surplus of bedrooms, and was handicap accessible. That isn’t going to attract anybody from the same buyer pool as the one we saw. Sorry if this is starting to sound like the real estate version of “Goldilocks”, but the last one was just right.

The last place was similar in square footage, was more updated, had newer systems and would attract buyers from a much broader pool. It sold for less than the asking price of the one we saw.  I had to tell him that I thought the one we saw was over priced.

I also had to tell him that with old houses, you just never know. Somebody could see that place and totally fall in love with it, with the end result being they paid more than any other buyer would.

All this reminds me of 2 houses I had listed on Wabash a long time ago. Both of them were totally and tastefully updated. The first one I listed was everything anybody could want in an old house, with the exception of very rough and very steep steps that went to the converted attic space. It was really nice up there, but getting there was posing a problem. Time after time (not trying to sound like Cyndi Lauper here) the feedback would be that the house was very nice but those stairs were a deal breaker. We did sell it however.  I should add that we actually sold it for much higher than the neighbors and a realtor who lived a few blocks away ever though was possible. The comps didn’t really support the asking price. We kind of pushed the envelope and it worked. The buyer was transferring from California, had a tight time line and everything in Lexington looked like a bargain!

The next house I listed on that road was equally nice. They had remodeled the upstairs, bumped out the roofline of the back and added a killer master bathroom and a walk-in closet. Those are 2 things you don’t see often in an older house, especially for the price range we were in. That house posed a different problem for me. See, the downstairs rooms were sooooo small. If you just looked at the comps, you’d have thought the house was worth about $20,000 more than it was. We had to sell it a little under the comps to make up for the small rooms because this time, there was no California transferee to be found.

So, you really have to have a feel for how buyers will perceive the house as a whole to know where to add or subtract value. That is the art part of the deal. Even to the most unemotional buyer, they still have to like the house to buy it. On the comp sheets that all the realtors use, it has the scientific stuff  like values for square footage differences, bathroom count, a finished basement verses unfinished basement, the number of garage spaces, etc. The problem is that if we don’t throw a little art into the comps we’ll just get them wrong…………unless the house is one of those where 3 identical houses have recently sold!