When is the best time to sell your house?

I’m seeing a lot of buzz lately saying right around now is the best time of year to sell your house. Many realtors post these articles. I can’t blame them. We are always saying “Now” is a good time to do anything, lol.

I am in now way doubting the statistics. Numbers don’t like. The problem though is knowing what they mean.

Fact: There are more buyers out in the market in the spring. It’s always been this way so I don’t see the newsworthiness of it.

Fact: The likelihood of your house selling for top dollar is less dependent on when you list than it is on the condition of your house and how it fits in the market…..meaning, how do buyers rank your house compared to what is currently available to them in terms of condition, price, floor plan, lot and location.

I have sold plenty of houses in multiple offers the very first day on the market back in 2008-2010. That was when it was an extreme Buyer’s Market.

It is a simple formula really.

You do some prep work. Fix anything that is going to keep a buyer from saying yes to your house. You want them to leave their showing with a positive emotional response. If there is work to be done on your house, they leave with a logical response. They are thinking about what they need to do to your house and how much it is going to cost. If they even make an offer, it will be less since they are deducting the cost of those repairs. So, leave them with nothing to do but fall in love.

Price it right. I don’t mean use what zillow, a recent appraisal or an AVM says the house is worth. Do some real research. See what has recently sold in your neighborhood. See what is pending in your neighborhood. Pending sales, while you don’t know the actually sale price until it closes, can tell you what buyers are doing in real time.

The last step is the most important one. You see what other choices a buyer has maybe 15% below and 15% higher than the value of your house. Then you price your house so it is clearly one of their top choices. Why? Because after 19 years in this business, the one biggest thing I have learned is that every buyer wants the best house they can get for their budget. As long as you have one of those houses, it will sell quickly for top dollar in any market and in any time of the year.

Winners & Losers of the NAR Settlement (Plus what I think about it)

Let’s get this out of the way first thing. Contrary to what the media and even President Biden has said after waking up from what looked like a great nap, real estate commissions have ALWAYS been negotiable.

Don’t believe the things you are reading in the media. Remember, their goal is to sensationalize news so you will read their article. The journalists assigned the task of telling you about changes in the real estate industry know little about it. They are only experts on the english language and shouldn’t postulate on much beyond that.

Okay, let’s begin with a brief history of how we coupled the commission for both the Listing Realtor and the Buyer’s Realtor.

Back in the olden days, you as a seller would hire a real estate agent to sell your house. They were tasked with finding you a buyer. They didn’t just put it on the market and wait for a buyer’s agent to show it like today. They had to literally procure a buyer for you. I don’t know who is responsible for this revelation, but somebody along the way figured out that some real estate agents had people wanting to buy a house. Just like the old Reese Cup commercials where somebody eating peanut butter crashed into somebody eating chocolate, it was discovered that the process of selling a house went faster if the agent with the house split the commission they charged with the agent who had the buyer. Voila! (Did you see what I said there? The entire commission was paid from the seller to the listing agent. It was the listing agent who agreed to split the commission THEY CHARGED with the buyer’s agent. It was NEVER the seller paying the buyer’s agent commission. It was the listing agent paying the buyer’s agent.)

Over time, this stuck. Early on, BOTH realtors worked for the seller. Even though the agent working with the buyer was helping the buyer, they owed loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the seller. Eventually that changed where we had laws to protect buyers which meant the buyer’s agent only represented the interests of the buyer. To make things easy for all, the MLS (Multi-listing Service) came into existence. We created policies and procedures to create transparency and order to the business of selling houses. One of which was to offer a commission to ANY realtor who produced the buyer for a listing. This was great because it meant the buyer’s agent knew what commission amount the listing agent was willing to offer should their buyer end up purchasing the place. While 3% in my market was the most common offered, there has always been offerings of 2%, 2.5% and even some fixed amounts.

Like all things, nothing last forever. This NAR Settlement is separating the buyer’s agent commission from that of the listing agent’s commission. We will no longer be able to post the commission amount on the MLS. That is really all that has changed.

I will point out that this is not a market driven decision. I don’t think anybody was really complaining about how the process worked. The public didn’t really understand the old way of doing things and I don’t think they will take the time to figure the new method out either. All they know is that it cost money to sell their house just as it costs money to do anything. If you are remodeling your kitchen, do you care that you are only paying your contractor who has separate deals worked out for each of the subcontractors? Why do you pay your contractor this way? Because it is easier for you and you are paying the only person you actually hired. Imagine if instead of paying just the contractor the whole amount, you paid him less but also then had to write checks to the plumber, electrician, cabinet contractor, and countertop person who worked on your house. Do you think it would be cheaper? No, it would be the same total, only you’d be writing more checks.

While I think the next year or so may be choatic, I do not think this will change all that much. We will see if I am wrong. Right now, there is a lack of organization because large brokerages, the NAR and local realtor associations are too afraid to say anything. I think they will try to leave it up to us to figure out. Currently, everybody is trying to figure out a way to benefit from the settlement. Zillow sent out an email saying they are here for us realtors. It wouldn’t surprise me if they are working on a way of creating what is effectively their own MLS. Many agents who expect a mass exodus of agents are working on setting up referrals so departing agents can still make a little money by sending their clients to active agents.

While I am sure average commission amounts might drop slightly, I don’t see that much of a change. Just like that kitchen remodel I mentioned above. In a great economy where there is a lot of work, prices are at the highest. When the economy is bad, your kitchen contractor isn’t going to work for half price. Sure, they will give you their best price. but they won’t take on the job if they can’t make a living.

One of the biggest reasons why I feel it won’t change much is because in every email I have gotten from NAR and my MLS, we have been reminded that while we cannot post an offered commission on the MLS soon, we can post a seller concession. I suspect that the commission will become similar to the way the Master Bedroom became the Primary Bedroom. It’s just a name change. The seller concession will be offered to allow buyer’s to pay their own agent. The amounts may change but the end result is unfazed. So what this might look like is that the listing agent charges a certain commission percentage and the seller offers a certain percentage as a concession to the buyer.

I am sure there will be lots of sellers who will offer no commission to the buyer’s. I am sure there will be agents who will work with these sellers. I also am sure that given enough time, both will realize that it is good to offer a commission/concession to the buyer so their agent gets paid. Why? The goal is to sell the house. How much money did you save if your house didn’t sell? Buyers want their own agent to help them make decisions and navigate the process. If no buyer’s agent can make even a penny from the sale, they simply won’t do it. Then who does the buyer’s agent tasks fall upon? The listing agent. I think in time, the listing agent will want more than their usual commission to do twice the work, which isn’t saving the seller anything.

So, let’s look at who are the Winners and Losers of the settlement:

Biggest winner: The lawyers of Cohen Milstein. Guessing they will get the usual 25-33% of the settlement. I wonder why nobody has ever filed a class action lawsuit against lawyers? They all seem to take the same percentage of a settlement or judgement. Sounds like collusion to me?????

Biggest loser: The National Association of Realtors. I don’t mean loser in the sense of they lost. I meant it more as a pronoun. They let us down. Regardless of whether anybody thinks real estate commissions are too high or not, the fact is that commissions have always been negotiable. They did a poor job of proving that and they are currently doing a pathetic job of helping realtors figure out how to help our sellers and buyers during this crazy time.

Let me add that if the NAR and local realtor associations are not going to help us right now, I see no need for their existence. I can post my listings on zillow, I can get documents from the Kentucky Real Estate Commission and I am sure I can figure out how to keep my lockboxes working. Provide leadership or you become as useful to us as Conferderate era coins.

Winner: Sellers. Not because of anything having to do with the settlement. Sellers have been winning the real estate game for years due to a shortage of houses for sale. Do remember though that nothing lasts forever. I have been in this business for so long that I remember sellers offering bonuses and even as much as 4% commission to the buyer’s agent. See, commissions have always been negotiable…..not everybody realizes that in a bad market the commission could go higher!

Loser: Buyers. You have been thrown under the bus. If you think you might be able to get a house for cheaper now, you will be surprised. You will not. If a seller has a $400k house, they are not going to list it for 97% of that because they want you to benefit. No, they will still sell it for $400k. How do I know? I have worked with several For Sale By Owners over the years. None have offered to sell for less since there is only one realtor to pay.

Loser: Realtors. We now have to figure out how to work for our clients without any organization or direction. We can’t discuss anything in a group or it is considered collusion.

I am anxious to see how all this goes. My predictions may be right. They may be wrong. I am sure I will be blogging about this in the near future as it develops.

Know this though. Regardless of what, it anything, changes. I am still here for my friends and clients. I only work with 3 group of people: Those who are past clients, those who have been referred to me by past clients and friends, and those who find this blog. I’m not really worried how I get paid or how much. If I really wanted to, I could liquidate a few assets and comfortably retire. This month marks my 19th year as a realtor. I plan to keep doing it as long as you all need me.

Reading the tea leaves when your house isn’t selling

House not selling? Wondering how to interpret what is going on? Here are a few of my thoughts on some common situations. The following assumes your house is being presented well online with plenty of good pictures and marketing remarks that describe it with more than trendy generic AI generated verbiage.

The house that gets lots of showings but no offers

Assuming that you don’t have some negative that wasn’t obvious like backing to a highway, apartments, or having an Eiffel Tower looking electrical thing in your yard, this situation simply means that the house doesn’t live up to what buyers expected. The good news with this one is that buyers think the price for what they thought the house would be is okay or else they wouldn’t come at all. The solution here is to either lower the price or improve the house so that it meets the expectations buyers have. Whichever is easiest.

I once had a condo that got tons of showings. I kept encouraging the seller to paint. Once we did, it sold. I recently had another listing that was getting tons of showings. It was a nice place, but just felt like a 15 year old house that needed a fresh vibe. The seller did some painting and replaced the flooring in all the bathrooms. As soon as it was done, it sold. Both of these places looked great online, and just needed to match what buyers thought they were getting. Both were improved for far less than the price reduction we would have needed, so both sellers actually came out better by going that route.

The house that gets no showings

This one is easy, but hard for sellers to accept. The price is too high. If a house is presented well on the MLS, and still nobody comes to see it, all you can do is lower the price. Real estate is all about price, location, and condition. You can’t change the location, but the other two you have some control over.

Also something to think about is this: If you have a $400k house and you’re asking $475k for it, buyers are comparing it to other houses that are really worth the asking price. The buyers who are going to spend what your house is really worth aren’t even going to see it since the list price is over their budget.

The house that gets the same bad feedback over and over

This is the least fun thing that can happen to a seller. I mean, they get kicked out of their house for showing after showing with no offers AND get to hear what people hate about their house.

Several years ago I had this really cool older house that had been mostly remodeled. It had the smallest living room I have ever seen……must have been the smallest anybody had ever seen since that is all I kept hearing after the showings. I’d ask for feedback and the buyer’s realtor would go on and on about how beautiful the place was, how unexpected it was to have walk-in closets in such an old house….then they would say their client wasn’t going to buy it since the living room was so small.

We tried putting in smaller scale furniture, but that didn’t help. After that, all we could do was drop the price. A price reduction opens the house up to a larger pool of buyers as well as enticing them to overlook a shortcoming if they are getting a better deal. We got that one sold too.

If you have a situation that doesn’t fit into these scenarios, give me a shout and I’ll let you know what to do.